Legal Opinion
Claim of Stevens v. MMR Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 5, 2002, which discharged the Special Fund for Reopened Cases from liability pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a.
Claimant suffered a work-related injury to his back in 1989 and thereafter received workers’ compensation benefits. In October 1994, following a hearing, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge found that claimant had lost no compensable time between May 1990 and September 1994 and, after resolving a notice of controversy in favor of the medical provider without prejudice, declared the case to be closed.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Carubia v. Colt IndustriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Jones v. HSBCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Knapp v. Empire Aluminum IndustriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Claim of Dumont v. Nestle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Buffum v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Barker v. Buffalo Color Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Granberry v. JCCA Edenwald, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Hartwell v. Amphenol Interconnect ProductsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Mackey v. RoofingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Stanford v. Lewis County OpportunitiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006