Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. McGrenera

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 25, 1982No. 17626Published

1DissentJustice Londrigan

The majority, in its construction of the statute, reaches a result that is contrary to the clear intent of the legislature. Accordingly, I dissent.

The majority concedes that the phrase, “a finding of guilt,” originated on the House floor as an alternative distinct from “a stipulation by the defendant of the facts supporting the charge.” They also concede that when offering the amendment containing this language, Representative Schlickman explained to the House that “a finding of guilt” could occur “upon a plea of guilty or upon a trial.” Additionally, in his introductory remarks and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The People v. OstrandIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. City of Elmhurst v. BuettgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People Ex Rel. Barrett v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API