Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Spring Valley Water Works

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870No. 2,323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifteenth District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This action was brought to restrain the defendant from cutting off and depriving the city of the supply of water for general municipal purposes. The plaintiff claims the right to tap any of the pipes of defendant, and take as much *478water as 'it may require .for the purpose of extinguishing fires, and for any and all other municipal uses, free of charge. This right the plaintiff has hitherto exercised, but the defendant, denying the right, except for the purpose of extinguishing fires, notified the plaintiff of its intention to cut off the supply for other purposes, and hence this suit. Upon…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Megerle v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harding v. HardingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Hawes v. Contra Costa Water Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1878
  3. Stone v. HutchinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1878
  4. City of San Francisco v. WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API