Commonwealth v. Pearce
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1DissentPerretta, J.
Because I do not agree that the prosecutor’s closing argument requires reversal of the defendant’s conviction, I respectfully dissent.
Defense counsel outlined her theory of defense to the trial judge in argument on a motion in limine by which she sought permission to cross-examine the victim about a prior rape. When the victim was eight years old, she was raped by a sixteen year old boy who was convicted and incarcerated for that crime. 1 Proceeding on the premise that the defendant never had sexual intercourse with the victim, defense counsel explained that it was her intention to show that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KozecMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. StockhammerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. FigueroaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ElliotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.