Legal Opinion

United States v. Walsh

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 23, 1996No. 95-1139PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

William Walsh was charged with various offenses growing out of a bank fraud scheme and convicted on a majority of the counts. His present appeal is primarily directed at procedural issues. We affirm.

I

Walsh was indicted in 1992, together with four co-defendants, and charged with conspiracy, twenty-nine counts of bank fraud, and twenty-nine counts of false statements. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 1344, 1014. The substance of the indictment was that Walsh carried out a scheme to defraud Dime Savings Bank of New York (“Dime-NY”). He did so, according to the charge, by directing his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. United States v. HoulihanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Perez-RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. BaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. MooneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API