People v. Seney
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
There was probable cause shown in the State Police Investigator’s affidavit to support issuance of the first eavesdropping warrant directed at defendant Raymond Seney and one Salerno. Investigator Whelan’s affidavit, detailing careful and extended police surveillance of the two men and others, contained circumstances linking them with a large-scale burglary ring preying on suburban estate owners. Those facts, together with the criminal history of the two men and their associates, and with their high style of living without…
2Cited by6 opinions
- People v. ElwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. RomneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. WirchanskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. WinogradNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. SeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.