Mineral Development Co. v. Kentucky Coal Lands Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern-District of Kentucky. ' Action at law by the Kentucky Coal Lands Company against the Mineral Development Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
A former phase of the question now involved was before us and is reported in Mineral Co. v. Tuggles Co., 151 Fed. 450, 81 C. C. A. 34. The present case was ejectment by the Kentucky Company against the Mineral Company. Upon the first trial of this case, a verdict was directed for defendant. The judgment entered on this verdict was reversed by this court (Kentucky Co. v. Mineral Co., 219 Fed. 45, 133 C. C. A. 151); and, upon the new-trial, there was a submission to the jury and a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant brings this writ of error. The parties will be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Albin Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Shea v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Carter v. Elk Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Kentucky Coal Lands Co. v. Mineral Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rowe v. KiddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Mineral Development Co. v. Kentucky Coal Lands Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1921
- Mineral Development Co. v. Kentucky Coal Lands Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920