Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Gillette Co.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided October 27, 2005No. MDL-1704PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman.

This litigation currently consists of two actions pending in the District of Massachusetts and one action pending in the Central District of California.1 Plaintiff in one of the District of Massachusetts actions moves the Panel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for an order centralizing this litigation in the District of Massachusetts. Defendant The Gillette Co. (Gillette) supports centralization. Plaintiff in a potential tag-along action in the Central District of California is the only respondent who opposes Section 1407 transfer.

On the basis of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Smith Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re M3Power Razor System Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API