Legal Opinion
Mykhal Lloyd Polite v. TitleMax of Arizona Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 11, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01574Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Mykhal Lloyd Polite, No. CV-25-01574-PHX-JZB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 TitleMax of Arizona Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File First Amended 16 Complaint” (“Motion for Leave to Amend,” and “Motion”) (doc. 26).1 Plaintiff seeks leave 17 to amend to clarify his allegations, add facts and correct errors, and to add two additional 18 claims. See (doc. 26 at 1–2.) The Court will deny the Motion without prejudice Because 19 Plaintiff’s proposed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.