State v. Healy
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
¶1 On trial for burglarizing model homes, Martin Healy testified he had been forced into committing *504the crimes by two former associates who discovered he was a police informant. The trial court instructed the jury on the statutory defense of duress, including optional language explaining that the defense is not available if the defendant recklessly put himself in a situation in which it is probable he would be subject to duress. Healy contends the court should not have instructed the jury on the recklessness exception because it gutted his duress defense and was unwarranted by the evidence.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Arthur Ronald Crittendon A/K/A Jabbar Muwakkil RagibCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ArbogastWashington Supreme Court · 2022
- State of Washington v. David Bruce Gunkel-RustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State of Washington v. Dean Lee AndersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State of Washington v. Enrique Murillo, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State of Washington v. Enrique Murillo, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.