Legal Opinion

Ville De Paris, B. H. Dyas, Corp. v. Connor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1926No. 16609Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DI'OKiSON, O.

The plaintiff in error was plaintiff and the defendant in error defendant in the court below, and will-liereafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

On the 7th day o-f January, 1925-, die-plaintiff commenced this action in the district court of Muskogee county against the defendant upon a promissory note. The petition was in the usual form, and alleged that the plaintiff was a coaporation organized under the laws of the s'-ate of California, with -its principal place of business at Los Angeles, Cal.: and that the defendant was a resident of McIntosh county, Okla.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. WillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API