Ville De Paris, B. H. Dyas, Corp. v. Connor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DI'OKiSON, O.
The plaintiff in error was plaintiff and the defendant in error defendant in the court below, and will-liereafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.
On the 7th day o-f January, 1925-, die-plaintiff commenced this action in the district court of Muskogee county against the defendant upon a promissory note. The petition was in the usual form, and alleged that the plaintiff was a coaporation organized under the laws of the s'-ate of California, with -its principal place of business at Los Angeles, Cal.: and that the defendant was a resident of McIntosh county, Okla.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clark v. WillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914