Legal Opinion

Crow v. Florence Ice & Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Lauderdale. Heard before Hon. W. H. Simpson. The bill in this cause was filed by the appellant, Thomas W. Crow, against tlie appellee, and others named in the opinion. The purpose of the bill, and averments thereof, and propositions raised by demurrer are shown by the opinion. A demurrer to the bill was sustained, and therefrom the complainant takes this appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDenson, J.

The bill in this case was filed by Thomas W. Crow in his individual capacity as a stockholder in the Florence Ice & Coal Company, a corporation, against the said corporation, Henry J. Moore, Walter D. Moore, John T. Ashcraft, F. E. Wright, Emmett O’Neal and James M. Crow.

One of the purposes of the bill is to have the court declare the issuance of 40 shares of stock in said corporation to F. E. Wright, on the 9th day of January, 1903, fictitious and void, and that the certificate of said stock be surrendered and cancelled.

Another purpose is to have the election of Henry J. Moore, Walter D.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nathan v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Moses v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Montgomery Traction Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Perry v. Tuskaloosa Cotton Seed Oil Mill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Bell v. Montgomery Light Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mudd v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Walsh v. State ex rel. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Ross v. American Banana Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Tillis v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API