Legal Opinion

M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Guaranty Financial, MHC

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 5, 2011No. 2010AP729PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

¶ 1. M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank appeals a circuit court order dismissing M&I's state law claims on federal preemption grounds. M&I's state law claims sought to reverse an exchange of shares of stock between defendant Guaranty Bank and defendant GB REIT on the grounds that the stock exchange amounted to fraudulent transfer and conversion of M&I assets pledged as collateral for a loan made by M&I to the defendant entities.1 The collateral for the loan was the GB REIT preferred shares, which were more valuable than the Guaranty Bank preferred shares.

¶ 2. Preemption became an issue because a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moran v. Wis. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
  2. Milwaukee City Housing Authority v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  3. Sohn Manufacturing Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  4. People v. Fuentes-EspinozaColorado Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API