Legal Opinion

Mewborn v. Mewborn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1954No. 317PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The intent of a testator is to be ascertained, if possible, from a consideration of his will from its four corners, and such intent should be given effect unless contrary to some rule of law or at variance with public policy. Coppedge v. Coppedge, 234 N.C. 113, 66 S.E. 2d 777; Elmore v. Austin, 232 N.C. 13, 59 S.E. 2d 205 ; House v. House, 231 N.C. 218, 56 S.E. 2d 695; Gannon v. Gannon, 225 N.C. 611, 36 S.E. 2d 17; Williams v. Rand, 223 N.C. 734, 28 S.E. 2d 247; Heyer v. Bulluch, 210 N.C. 321, 186 S.E. 356.

Iii order to effectuate the intention of the testator, the court may disregard or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Elmore v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Entwistle v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. McCain v. WombleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Wachovia Bank & Trust Company v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Clapper v. ClapperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API