Legal Opinion

Oden v. McCraney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 13, 1938No. 6 Div. 196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The appeal is from a judgment for plaintiff in a suit for money had and receivedi

Plaintiff represented a number of citi-' zens of Leeds, Ala., in an effort to locate a cotton cleaning plant in that municipality, and made an effort to secure a site for the plant. Defendants were interested in the sale of five acres ©f land in Leeds, owned by the Vida Lumber Company; but the cotton plant people only wanted two acres. Defendants demanded $5,000 for the five acres, and declined to sell only the two acres desired. During these negotiations plaintiff paid, and defendants received,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reid v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Griel & Bro. v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Hanchey v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Elliott v. McCraneyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Elliott v. McCraneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Bessemer v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. O'DONOHUE v. Citizens BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Persons v. SummersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Van Landingham v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Birmingham Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. SellersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API