Thrasher v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge.
A jury found James Thrasher guilty of possession of cocaine. Thrasher appeals from the verdict and the denial of his motion for a new trial.
1. Thrasher contends in his first enumeration that the trial court erred in allowing the state to improperly place his character in issue by introducing evidence of a prior conviction for possession of marijuana.
On direct examination, Thrasher stated that he told the arresting officer, “Well, I don’t mess with dope.” On cross-examination, the district attorney asked Thrasher, “When you said you don’t deal with dope, that’s a lie, isn’t it?”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKenzey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Hoover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Holland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Lockaby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Hancock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Height v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.