Legal Opinion

Thrasher v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 2, 1992No. A92A0521PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

A jury found James Thrasher guilty of possession of cocaine. Thrasher appeals from the verdict and the denial of his motion for a new trial.

1. Thrasher contends in his first enumeration that the trial court erred in allowing the state to improperly place his character in issue by introducing evidence of a prior conviction for possession of marijuana.

On direct examination, Thrasher stated that he told the arresting officer, “Well, I don’t mess with dope.” On cross-examination, the district attorney asked Thrasher, “When you said you don’t deal with dope, that’s a lie, isn’t it?”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKenzey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Hoover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Holland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Lockaby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Hancock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Height v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API