Legal Opinion
United States v. Ruth Zicree, Harold Kaufman and Fredesvinda Mercedes Gonzalez, United States of America v. Harold Kaufman and Ruth Zicree
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1979No. 78-5613, 79-1875PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:
In this consolidated appeal from multiple convictions for mail fraud, we must decide whether the evidence adduced at trial is sufficient to support the convictions, whether the appellants were improperly joined together in one trial, whether the trial judge erred in denying appellants’ motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, whether the trial judge erred in presenting a particular Allen charge, and whether the trial judge erred in allowing an expert witness to testify for the government. Because we believe that the trial judge ruled…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Mayo Perez, DefendantsappellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- John P. Tillman, Robert Barber Moore, Johnny C. Wilson, Larry Fox, Donald P. Stone and Michael W. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Tillman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States v. CaporaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.