Legal Opinion

Feffer v. Goodkind, Wechsler, Labaton & Rudoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered February 28, 1991, which, insofar as appealed from, imposed sanctions on plaintiff and his attorneys pursuant to 22 NYCRR part 130, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a former partner in defendant law firm who seeks an accounting and dissolution, signed a partnership agreement with a broad arbitration clause, but argued that the dispute is not arbitrable because the partnership had been abrogated. The IAS court, citing Matter of Cassone (63 NY2d 756), held that the dispute was arbitrable "[w]ithout question,”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re the Estate of CassoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Feffer v. Goodkind, Wechsler, Labaton & RudoffNew York Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Entertainment Partners Group, Inc. v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  2. John C. v. Martha A.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1992
  3. Williams v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API