R.G.S. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Judge.
The appellant, R.G.S., a juvenile, contends the trial court erred in committing him to the custody of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) without making proper findings of fact in compliance with section 39.09(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1989). He also contends the trial court erred in imposing a general sentence of commitment against him for three separate offenses, rather than imposing a specific sentence for each offense. While we find no merit in either contention and affirm, we shall address the issue regarding compliance with section 39.09(3)(e).
R.G.S.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In the Interest of T.S.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3Cited by14 opinions
- M.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- E.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- P.D.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- C.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- P.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.