Legal Opinion

Daniel Albert Salkil v. Paul Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center William Webster, Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1993No. 92-1537PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Following the death of Daniel Albert Salkil’s wife, Salkil agreed to answer police officers’ questions. During questioning at the police station, Salkil stated that he wanted an attorney and the questioning ended. Salkil was released and no charges were brought. Later, while Salkil was in jail on different charges, Salkil’s cellmate overheard Salkil say that he had his wife killed. The cellmate informed the police of Salkil’s statement and the police placed the cellmate back in Salkil’s cell to get additional information. Salkil then told the cellmate that he killed his wife. The state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Wayne B. Alexander v. State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Arthur Lee Ford v. William ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. State v. SalkilMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Salkil v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Trinity Edward IngleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Trinity Edward IngleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API