Legal Opinion

Peyton v. Bailey Butler and John Butler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1816PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts are, that in January, 1813, the defendants, claiming a right derived under the entry of one Petrie, sold their shaves of it to the complainant. It was an entry of a saltpetre cave. He gave divers notes for the payment of the purchase-money, some to persons that the defendants owed, and some to themselves respectively. The greater part of these notes has been paid. The entry is included within the bounds of lands granted in 1795 to S. Donnelson. The entry was therefore void which Petrie made, and which the defendants sold. Bailey Butler, who made the contract, stated the value of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. BokorTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Barnes v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API