Legal Opinion

McCrory v. Richland Township Road Improvement District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 14, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Richland Road Improvement District was organized by an act of the General Assembly passed at an extraordinary session in 1920, and it is the contention of appellants that the district entered into a contract with appellant Ran McGregor to do certain construction work, and that McGregor, with the consent of the district, sublet the work to McCrory and Mitchell, but the district wrongfully refused to permit appellants to perform their contract, and this suit was brought to recover damages resulting from this breach.

The. court found that there was no valid contract, and dismissed the complaint.

Ap…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bayou Meto Drainage District v. ChaplineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Bowman Engineering Co. v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Seitz v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Sain v. BogleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Sikes v. DouglasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Street Improvement District No. 130 of Hot Springs v. CrockettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API