Legal Opinion
United States v. Dunn
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 21, 1997No. Criminal Action 96-40030-01-DESPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s Partial Motion for Rehef From United States District Court Rule 47.1 (Doc. 44) and Motion for New Trial (Doe. 43).
A. Partial Motion for Relief From. United States District Court Rule 47.1 (Doc. 44)
Over 200 pounds of marijuana were admitted into evidence at the trial of this case. The defendant moves the court for rebef from D. Kan. Rule 47.1 in order to ask jurors whether they were able to notice the odor of marijuana in the courtroom during trial, whether the odor was extremely strong or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. J.C. Chatman, True Name Jon ChatmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKenzie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- United States v. MilneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017