Legal Opinion

Whittemore v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1980No. 4314PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER, * BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. PER CURIAM.

Kermit D. Whittemore was charged by felony complaint twice amended, of violating the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act, AS 17.10.010 et seq., by having a narcotic drug, cocaine, knowingly in his possession and control. After his motion to suppress the cocaine was denied, Whittemore entered a plea of nolo contendere, reserving the right to appeal the validity of the search and seizure of that evidence. 1 He was found guilty and given a suspended imposition of sentence with three years’ probation subject to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Oveson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. United States v. Ronald Deberry and Julius EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Anderson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. McConnell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PontierIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Schaffer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
  3. Marriage of RohrichMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Schaffer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
  5. State v. PontierIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API