Legal Opinion

Matteini v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 8, 2006No. 5D05-3704PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOrfinger, J.

Michelle and Russell Matteini, on behalf of and as parents and natural guardians of Sierra Matteini, a minor, appeal a final administrative order denying their petition for benefits under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (“the Plan”), sections 766.301-.316, Florida Statutes (2006). In a final order, the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) determined that Sierra had not suffered a “birth-related neurological injury,” as the proof failed to “support the conclusion that, more likely than not, Sierra’s neurological impairment was the result of 'a brain or spinal cord…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nica v. Div. of Administrative HearingsSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. LEAF v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'n v. McKaughanSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  4. Schur v. Florida Birth-Related NeurologicalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Carreras v. FLA. BIRTH-RELATED NICADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCloskey v. Department of Financial ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API