Legal Opinion

Prudential Capital Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 21, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, entered on January 6, 1964, granting summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion denied, with costs to abide the event. Plaintiff, a factor, sues an insurance company. It appears that plaintiff participated in the factoring of BojCraft Enterprises, Inc., by Whitehall Mercantile Corp., another factor. Bo-Craft Enterprises obtained advances from Whitehall on the strength of spurious invoices and documents of delivery, and losses were sustained as a result. Defendant resists payment on a broker’s blanket bond attached to an indemnity policy which it had issued to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Harris v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Fidelity Trust Company v. American Surety Company of New York and Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. The First National Bank of South Carolina of Columbia v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
  5. Fidelity Trust Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Exchange National Bank of Olean v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Jones v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. William Iselin & Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. William Iselin & Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API