Legal Opinion

Wolfman v. Board of Appeals of Brookline

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 13, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

The defendant board granted the defendant developers various permits and variances which allow the developers to build a sixty-unit apartment building on a lot situated at the corner of Beacon and Borland Streets in Brookline. These units, if constructed, will be sold as condominiums having off-street parking facilities and certain amenities, such as balconies and a swimming pool. Pursuant to G. L. c. 40A, § 17, the plaintiffs appealed to the Superior Court, where the trial judge concluded that the board had not exceeded its authority in granting the permits and variances. The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Markell v. Sidney B. Pfeifer Foundation, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Josephs v. Board of Appeals of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Cormier v. CartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Dion v. Board of Appeals of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Framingham Clinic, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paulding v. BruinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Tebo v. Board of Appeals of ShrewsburyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  3. Guiragossian v. Board of Appeals of WatertownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Grasso v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
  5. Sprogis v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Fall RiverMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API