Legal Opinion

Pottkamp v. Buss

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1896No. S. F. No. 183Published

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; James M. Troutt, Judge. Action by Adolph Pottkamp against John G-. Buss and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Per curiam 1

This action was commenced June 16, 1888, and defendants answered and filed a cross-complaint, upon which issue was also taken. During the trial, plaintiff asked and obtained leave to file an amended complaint; but *463when it was prepared the court refused to permit it to be filed, upon the ground that it did not conform to the proofs. Judgment went against the plaintiff, and his motion for a new trial was denied. On December 8, 1892, this court reversed the judgment and order upon the ground that the court below erred in refusing to permit the plaintiff to file his amended complaint, and…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pottkamp v. BussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API