Legal Opinion

Nottbohm v. Tesla, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 13, 2024No. 3:23-cv-05171Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JORMA NOTTBOHM, Case No. 23-cv-05171-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE ARBITRATION v. 9 10 TESLA, INC., Defendant. 11 12 13 Defendant Tesla, Inc., asks to compel arbitration of plaintiff Jorma Nottbohm’s 14 employment discrimination claims before the JAMS arbitration service pursuant to an 15 employment contract. Dkt. No. 18.1 Nottbohm signed a contract with an arbitration clause that 16 expressly requires the parties to arbitrate employment-related disputes at JAMS. Dkt. No. 18-2, 17 Exh. A at ECF p. 7. Nottbohm has not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shannon McBurnie v. Rac Acceptance East, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API