Legal Opinion · Concurrence

King v. Warner Pac. Coll., an Or. Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 2019No. A163586Published

1ConcurrenceJames, J.

This case comes before us in the deeply troubling posture of admitted religious discrimination. After plaintiff filed suit, Warner Pacific admitted it discriminated against him on the basis of his religion, but claimed that its otherwise unlawful act was permissible under ORS 659A.006(4), which provides, in part:

"It is not an unlawful employment practice for a bona fide church or other religious institution, including but not limited to a school, hospital or church camp, to prefer an employee, or an applicant for employment, of one religious sect or persuasion over another if:
"* * * * *
"(c)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Ralph Murrell v. Larry D. Bennett, Commissioner of Alabama Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Chapman v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Piazza v. KellimOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Chadd v. Midwest Franchise Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API