Legal Opinion
Hucke v. New Orleans Glass
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 2004No. 2003-CA-1709PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
bDAVID S. GORBATY, Judge.
In this appeal, defendants New Orleans Glass aver that the workers’ compensation judge erred in finding that plaintiff sustained a work-related accident and in finding that defendant arbitrarily and capriciously failed to pay benefits to the plaintiff, Ernest Hucke. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 26, 2002, plaintiff was doing lay-out work and welding at St. Charles Condominiums. At the end of the day, plaintiff was required to put his tools in what is called a gang box, which is located on the ninth floor of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & GraniteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Menard v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sears v. Berg Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Rapp v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TAI A. PHAM v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Hamilton v. Compass Group USA/MorrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Kenneth Prevost v. City of New Orleans Fire DepartmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- Kenneth Prevost v. City of New Orleans Fire DepartmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- Mark Shubert v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.