Legal Opinion

Hebert v. Succession of Vezoux

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1930No. 11,623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

This is a suit for damages for the alleged breach of a contract to purchase certain real estate belonging to plaintiff. Fernand Vezoux had contracted to buy the property and, at the time of his death, had failed or refused to execute the agreement.

In deciding the case adversely to plaintiff, the trial court gave the following reasons:

“Of the defenses urged by the Succession, I need consider only that which is based on the fact that the title of Hebert to the property in question was subject to restrictions on the use and disposal of it, none of which was mentioned in the contract on which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Giacoma v. YochimLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farthing v. NeelyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Williams v. MeyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Bolian v. PorcheLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Stauss v. KoberLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Oubre v. StassiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API