Legal Opinion

Wilson Freight Forwarding Co. v. Seal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1951No. Appeals, Nos. 64 and 65PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

Wilson Freight Forwarding Co., Inc. has taken two appeals. Appeal No. 65, January Term, 1951, in which Louis Malackov is also an appellant, is from. the re-, fusal of the court below to grant motions for judgment non obstante veredicto. Appeal No. 64, January Term, 1951, is from the refusal of the court below to grant Wilson’s motion for a new trial and entry of judgment against it.

Appeal No. 65 concerns an action in trespass instituted by George K. Seal, Joseph S. Seal and Richard F. Wert against Wilson Freight Forwarding Co'., Inc., Eastern Motor Dispatch,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flanigan v. McLeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Kindt v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Stubbs v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Bloom v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Collichio Et Ux. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roadman v. BelloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Dranzo v. WinterhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Flynn v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Heckathorne v. Lutton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API