Steele v. Gorman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.
These proceedings are had under the provisions of secs. 89.01 to 89.70 of the Statutes. They are purely statutory. Sec. 89.03 provides that all proceedings under the drainage district law are equitable in their nature, and sub. (3), sec. 89.07, provides that all issues arising under the drainage district law except issues of benefits and damages shall be tried by the court without a jury. So far as an appeal by a petitioner is concerned, the statute, sec. 89.15, provides, “The time within which an appeal to the supreme court may be taken from any judgment or appealable order in drainage…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dryden v. SwinburnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
- Crocker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Drummer Creek Drainage District v. RothIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Hewitt v. . City MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Lemmons v. HuberOregon Supreme Court · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Radich v. Fairbanks Builders, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1965
- Netherton v. HoltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Mountain States Implement Co. v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- National Bond & Investment Co. v. Nash Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925