Legal Opinion

Fryar v. Western-Atlantic Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1969No. Nos. 18671, 18672PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In these consolidated cases Appellants appeal from orders of the United States *1327District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Southern Division, 295 F.Supp. 740, granting Defendant-Appel-lee’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs and argument of counsel, and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Appellants, we are of the opinion that reasonable minds could reach but one conclusion, namely, that the Defendant-Appellee was not negligent in any respect which was a proximate cause of damages sustained in Case No.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maxwell v. Western-Atlantic RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herbert E. Fryar, Etc. v. Western-Atlantic Railroad Company, Mae Bell Maxwell v. Western-Atlantic Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API