Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Russell v. Artuz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated March 13, 1998, which dismissed the proceeding.

*513Ordered, that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Habeas corpus relief is not available to the appellant because he failed to establish that the granting of the writ would result in his immediate release (see, People ex rel. Kaplan v Commissioner of Correction of City of N. Y., 60 NY2d 648; People ex rel. Brettschneider v Warden, 253 AD2d 729).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Kaplan v. Commissioner of CorrectionNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People ex rel. Brettschneider v. Warden of Department of CorrectionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Nizin v. SchriroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API