Legal Opinion

Baum v. Abel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1964No. 31535PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

This jury-waived case involves, in separate counts, two promissory notes, one of which is for $5500 and the other for $1440. Defendant admitted execution of the notes but alleged lack of consideration as an affirmative defense. Judgment below was for plaintiff for the principal amount of each note, together with interest thereon, and defendant appealed.

To sustain his burden plaintiff introduced the notes in evidence, and then called defendant to the stand as an adverse witness, *165under the provisions of Section 491.030, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. Defendant admitted that he had…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shepard v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Draper v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Klotsch v. P. F. Collier & Son Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. Orlann v. LaederichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Lolordo v. LacySupreme Court of Missouri · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dean v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. New Bedford Institution for Savings v. GildroyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  3. Springfield General Osteopathic Hospital v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Sloan v. ParisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Custom Head, Inc. v. KraftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API