Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Klem

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 2004No. 2:03-cv-03040PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Petitioner Richard McIntyre (“McIntyre”) brings this petition for writ of habe-as corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I referred the petition to the magistrate judge for a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The R & R, recommended that I deny the petition. McIntyre filed timely objections and respondent filed a response to those objections. McIntyre then sought and was granted permission to file a praecipe. In his praecipe, McIntyre argued that the R & R failed to apply the holding from a Third…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
Tyrone Werts v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
Price, Warden v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Rivera v. GoodeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008