Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Friedman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 8, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

This is an application to vacate a notice of examination before trial, as an adverse party, of Johanna Jensen, the proponent of the will.

1. It is contended that she is not an adverse party within the meaning of section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, because she is not named in the objections as a party who exercised undue influence, citing Matter of Levy (198 App. Div. 773) and Matter of Miller (N. Y. L. J. Sept. 28, 1928). In these cases, however, the persons sought to be examined by the contestants were not proponents of the wills, and, not haying been named in the objections, were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HodgmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920
  2. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Gaydica v. SzemkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of ClenenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API