Legal Opinion

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1998No. 84898, 84899 consPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

Central Illinois Public Service Company (CIPS) and the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission) appeal the decision of the appellate court (293 Ill. App. 3d 459) reversing the Illinois Commerce Commission’s order allowing the use of CIPS’s fuel adjustment clause (FAC) 1 to recover costs associated with a fuel contract modification. We now reverse the judgment of the appellate court and hold that the fuel contract modification costs and associated carrying costs, or interest costs, are recoverable through an FAC.

BACKGROUND

In 1975, CIPS entered into a long-term contract for the purchase of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. United Cities Gas Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Harrisonville Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Fleet Business Credit, LLC v. Enterasys Networks, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Prestwick Capital Management, Ltd. v. Peregrine Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Comonwealth Edison Company v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  5. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API