Legal Opinion
In re Morrissey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 18, 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Francis X. Morrissey was admitted to the practice *256of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on October 15, 1973. At all times relevant to these proceedings, respondent maintained his principal place of business within the First Judicial Department.*
On October 8, 2009, following a jury trial in Supreme Court, New York County, respondent was found guilty of scheme to defraud in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.65 [1] [b]), conspiracy in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 105.10 [1]), and forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.10 [1]),…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In re ConroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re MorrisseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re VelellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re JustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re PostelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
4Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of OgiharaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re SenguptaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re SenguptaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Nachamie v. CuriamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of YuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016