Legal Opinion

Forney v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1932No. 28217PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is a writ of error to the district court for Wayne county. The plaintiff in error, Claude Forney, hereafter called the defendant, was convicted of the felonies set out in sections 69-109 and 69-110, Comp. St. 1929, commonly known as selling and removing mortgaged property, which offenses were set out in five counts in the information, and the jury returned a verdict of guilty upon counts 2, 3, 4, and 5, and the district court entered a sentence of two years in the penitentiary upon each of four counts, said sentences to run concurrently.

The information charged that a mortgage was given…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Korth v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Blair v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Sheppard v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. May v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. HilpertNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Severin v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Opinion No. (1983), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API