Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spangler v. Spangler
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrenceBrosky, Judge
I concur in the result reached by the majority. The majority’s decision affirming the lower court’s finding that Ronald Lee S. is the father of Richard Lee S. and that, therefore, he must pay child support for the child is based on the fact that the child was born during the marriage of appellant and appellee. Pursuant to the time-honored legal presumption that children born in wedlock are legitimate, the majority holds that appellant is the child’s father. Manfredi’s Estate, 399 Pa. 285, 159 A.2d 697 (1960).
*193The parties were legally married at the time conception occurred, although they were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wiegand v. WiegandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Harry v. EastridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Manfredi EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.