United States ex rel. Roman v. Rauch
District Court, S.D. New York
Certiorari by the United States, on the relation of Isadore Roman, against Adolph Rauch and others, as members of the Rocal Board on. Classification, under Selective Service Act May 18, 1917, for Division No. 157, City of New York.
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(orally). The question presented by this record is purely one of law. Whether rightly or wrongly an actual writ of certiorari has issued, and to that writ a return has been made, accompanied by an answer to the petition for the writ. In the United States court the questions that are presented by such a record are perhaps in my humble opinion somewhat different from what they would be or are in any and every state in the Union, because there is probably no state which has not enlarged, limited, or created judicial jurisdiction in the matter of certiorari by statute, which the United States has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Ex Parte VallandighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Angelus v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. CasinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- Drumheller v. Berks County Local Board No. 1Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Petition of SobermanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Dick v. TevlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- United States v. ButtecaliDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.