Legal Opinion

New Jersey Racing Commission v. Elliot

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 3, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KESTIN, J.A.D.

Four trainers licensed by the New Jersey Racing Commission appeal from a decision of the Commission imposing fines and suspending their licenses and privileges for extended periods ranging from thirty months to sixty-six months. We affirm.

The orders were based upon findings that horses under the care of each trainer had tested positive for the drug “fenspiride”, thereby establishing violations of N.J.A.C. 13:71-23.6, the “trainer responsibility” rule, and N.J.A.C. 13:71-23.1, the “no medication” rule. The sanctions in each case included…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Texter v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Matter of CVS Pharmacy WayneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Dare v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Moiseyev v. NEW JERSEY RACING COM'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Jersey Racing Commission v. SilvermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  2. DARRAN CASSAR VS. NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION (NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API