Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. City of Ashland

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1941Published

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Appellant assigns as error the granting of defendant’s motion for a nonsuit and urges that there was an actionable insufficiency and want of repair in the sidewalk where she fell and that this caused her fall. Concerning the alleged defect it appears that the walk was concrete and some fourteen feet wide; that in the center of the sidewalk there was set an iron frame to which doors were attached with two hinges. The hinges were about three fourths of an inch high. About twenty inches west of the west hinge there was a break in the surface of the walk. A long crack led into the center…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kleiner v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. McCormick v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Cooper v. Village of WaterlooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ross v. City of ShawanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Hansen v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API