Legal Opinion

Fulmer v. Baber

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 17, 1957No. 36675PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

We will first consider whether the trial judge erred in striking the defendant’s answers. The answers alleged that the parties agreed to hold the checks and not present them to the bank until the books had been audited and the exact figure of the purchase had been ascertained. Delivery of an instrument may be conditional. “ ‘As between immediate parties, and as regards a remote party other than a holder in due course, the delivery, in order to be effectual, must be made either by or under the authority of the party making, drawing, accepting, or indorsing, as the case may be; and in such case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. South Georgia Trust Co. v. CrandallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Satterwhite v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Murphy v. Drum & Bugle CorpsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Empire Mortgage & Investment Corp. v. DonaldsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Highway Department v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API