Collins v. Grabler
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Sullivan, J.
I respectfully dissent from the result and from the reasoning stated in the opinion by Judge Lowdermilk. I believe that it was error for the trial court to sustain defendant’s motion for new trial.
*596ASSUMPTION OF RISK, AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, IS NOT PROPERLY ARGUABLE UNDER DEFENDANT’S SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE SPECIFICATION
It is apparent from examination of the opinion written by Judge Lowdermilk which I shall hereafter refer to as the primary opinion,1 the record, and the briefs filed herein that the parties, the trial court, and my learned colleagues, Judges…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
- O'Maley v. South Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- STALLINGS v. DickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Pierce v. ClemensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Bailey v. KainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.