Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Pirtle
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 17, 1969No. 44358PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
At the hearing on the motion for summary judgment it was shown by the admission of third parties defendant and by application against the plaintiff of the holding in Moore v. Hanson, 224 Ga. 482 (1) (162 SE2d 429) that the plaintiff in this personal injury suit had previ ously executed a covenant not to sue which fell within the provisions of Code Ann. § 56-408.1 (Ga. L. 1963, p. 643). See Aetna Casualty Co. v. Brooks, 106 Ga. App. 427 (127 SE2d 183), reversed by 218 Ga. 593 (129 SE2d 798), but revived by Ga. L. 1963, p. 643. Accordingly, this case is controlled…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Moore v. HansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Jackson v. KightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Fillingame v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scarbrough v. Andrews Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Milline v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Green v. FaganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971