Legal Opinion

Chatmon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 17, 2016No. CR-15-660PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

hRolandis Larenzo Chatmon appeals the denial of his pro se petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 37.1' of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. Also pending are Chatmon’s motion and amended motion to remand to the trial court, as well as his motion for appointment of counsel. Because it is clear from the record that Chatmon cannot prevail on appeal, we affirm and his motions are moot.

On August 9, 2013, Chatmon was’found guilty by a jury of three counts of aggravated robbery and one count of theft of property. He was sentenced, as a habitual offender with a firearm…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Henington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Abernathy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rea v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Frankie Von Holt v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API